During a recent panel discussion I was asked what I believed was the biggest obstacle to the emergence of Psychological Safety. My one word response? Fear!
To me, the biggest obstacle to psychological safety is fear of vulnerability and/or retribution, often stemming from concerns about potential negative consequences for speaking up, especially in more hierarchical or blame-oriented environments. This fear can manifest as reluctance to share ideas, admit mistakes, or challenge the status quo, ultimately hindering open communication and team performance.
Worse still, this level of fear can lead to the formation of a self-fulfilling prophecy that becomes embedded in team culture. In “Next Generation Safety Leadership: From Compliance to Care” I summarised this graphically as the “Fear Loop”.
Such fears among employees can take many forms. Here are some common examples:
1. Fear of Negative Consequences:
- Fear of Retribution: Individuals worry about being penalized, judged, or even fired for expressing dissenting opinions or admitting errors.
- Fear of Stigma: They may be concerned about being labeled as incompetent, a troublemaker, or someone who can't be trusted.
- Fear of Futility: Some believe that speaking up will have no impact, making it pointless to take the risk.
- Fear of Blame: Individuals may fear being held solely responsible for problems, even if they were part of a larger systemic issue.
2. Hierarchy and Power Dynamics:
- Hierarchical Structures: In organizations with strong power imbalances, individuals in lower positions may hesitate to speak up to those in higher positions.
- Lack of Open Communication: If leaders don't actively encourage open dialogue and feedback, it can create an environment where employees feel uncomfortable sharing their thoughts.
- Authoritarian Leadership: Leaders who are unwilling to accept criticism or feedback can stifle psychological safety.
3. Individual Characteristics:
- Personality Traits: Some individuals may be naturally more prone to anxiety or self-doubt, making them hesitant to speak up.
- Past Negative Experiences: Prior negative experiences related to speaking up can create a lasting fear of repeating those experiences.
4. Organizational Factors:
- Lack of Defined Responsibilities: When roles and expectations are unclear, it can lead to confusion and hesitation to speak up.
- Lack of Support: A lack of support from leadership or peers can make individuals feel isolated and vulnerable.
- Inadequate Resources: Insufficient resources can create pressure and anxiety, making it difficult to focus on psychological safety.
- Information Overload: Too much information can be overwhelming and make it difficult to identify and address specific issues related to psychological safety.
5. Misconceptions about Psychological Safety:
- "Niceness" vs. Safety: Some believe psychological safety means being overly nice and avoiding conflict, which can be detrimental to honest communication.
- "Coddling" vs. Safety: It's also a misconception that psychological safety means protecting individuals from all discomfort and challenges.
Addressing these obstacles requires a multifaceted approach that includes:
- Creating a culture of trust and respect: Leaders need to foster an environment where employees feel safe to express their opinions and ideas without fear of negative consequences.
- Establishing clear expectations and responsibilities: When roles and expectations are well-defined, it reduces ambiguity and anxiety.
- Encouraging open communication and feedback: Leaders should actively solicit feedback and create opportunities for open dialogue.
- Addressing power imbalances: Efforts should be made to reduce power differentials and ensure that all voices are heard.
- Providing training and support: Training on psychological safety and conflict resolution can help individuals develop the skills and confidence to speak up.
- Promoting a growth mindset: Encouraging a belief that mistakes are learning opportunities can help reduce the fear of failure.
- Regularly assessing psychological safety: Using tools and surveys to gauge the level of psychological safety within a team or organization can help identify areas for improvement.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Clive Lloyd is an Australian psychologist who assists high-hazard organisations to improve their safety performance through the development of trust and psychological safety and by doing Safety Differently. He is the co-director and principal consultant of GYST, and developer of the acclaimed CareFactor Program.